Saturday, April 15, 2017

Conclusion

This Heartear project is complete, and I am changed.

One friend asked my wife if this experience was going to make me a Republican. While I am not changing political parties, I will be a more critical, better informed liberal.

Another friend asked me if the process was healing. Not healing but transforming. The project exercised my mind and spirit much in the way daily physical exercise increases stamina and capacity for effort.

Encountering the other rather than avoiding, and trying to understand rather than judge strengthened my resolve to seek beauty, delight and kindness each and every day, year by year, thought by thought.

Friday, April 14, 2017

Understanding versus indoctrination

Article

PBS Islamic Lesson Plan Encourages Students to Identify with Radical Jihadists



Christian Action Network letter to Education Secretary Betsy DeVos


Summary

Breitbart and its like are reporting on a finding from The Heartland Institute (a "free-market think tank") that objects to a lesson plan offered by PBS Learning Media because its one-sided emphasis on the Palestinian perspective indoctrinates young people to sympathize with terrorists.

Quote

"The material {sic} go far beyond mere education about the Islamic religion in comparison to other religions. They are undisguised indoctrination materials, effectively a Sunday school class for Islam. The materials encourage impressionable age children to study Islamic prayer, Islamic doctrine (e.g., the Five Pillars), and Islamic practices without any hint that these matters are to be compared to or contrasted with the prayers, doctrines or practices of other religions. They are entirely stand-alone promoting the religion and practice of Islam. The indoctrination materials include worksheets, questions, activities and media that lure children into Islamic worship. "
Attorney letter on behalf of the Christian Action Network

Understanding

The conservative media gets a twofer with this story because it entwines public broadcasting with Islamic terrorism. Beneath the surface is the conflict between religion and secular humanism. The story also gives us an opportunity to consider the role of critical thinking in education.

The lesson plan is reportedly for 5th through 12th grades. These are young people who are of an age where they are aware of  the news and forming their identity. The lesson plan provides them an opportunity to consider a perspective other than their own and get beneath the headlines. Critics fail to recognize the role the teacher will play in responding to the students' opinions.

Religion and politics merge when it comes to Islam and the combination is combustible. My friend Marcia mentioned last night, "Everyone is afraid."  Indeed. Let's pay attention to how fear drives us and how far we are willing to go, how much we escalate, because of our personal fears.


Thursday, April 13, 2017

Historical or hysterical perspective?

Article

Why Progressives Hate Steve Bannon’s Cyclical View Of History

Summary

A correspondent for The Federalist argues that liberals reject a cyclical understanding of history because it counters their idea of progress toward utopia.

Quote

"Progressives take it as a matter of faith that history has sides, that it is heading in a certain direction, and that it’s up to us to usher in a secular paradise. For progressives like Ashbrook, merely anticipating a crisis in the age of Trump makes a crisis more likely to happen, which might harm the progressive cause. Hence, writers like Howe are guilty of enabling people like Bannon."

Understanding

We have such a knack for creating the illusion of control. We construct cyclical patterns of history to model what we should expect in the future. We imagine spiritual-poetic values in creation as Martin Luther King Jr. articulated, "the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice." We use books Steve Bannon reportedly likes to predict how he will act. Or, self-disclosure alert, we get up an hour early each morning to scan media sources outside our personal bubble to try to understand what the hell is going on.

This tendency of ours is useful and limited. It is vanity to over play the extent we are in charge  but as The Boss wrote, "at the end of every hard-earned day people find some reason to believe."

I want our leaders to have a fully formed worldview and act out of a thoughtfully earned philosophy. I also want them humble enough to know their worldview isn't the only viable perspective.



Wednesday, April 12, 2017

Spicer holds the mirror

Article

Liberal Media Attacks Sean Spicer Over Poorly Worded Hitler Reference – Ignores Years of Obama Anti-Semitic Policies


Summary

The Gateway Pundit defends Spicer by -

  1. Pointing out Jared Kushner is Jewish
  2. Claiming the Left is hysterical
  3. Attacking Obama

Quote

"It would be naive and stupid to say that what Sean Spicer said was anti-Semitic. That is a plain and simple truth regarding this entire situation and it is part of the double-standards game that the left loves to play when it comes to their “supreme leader” Barack Obama – after all, without double-standards, the left would not have any standards to speak of." 

Understanding

The conservative media sources I scan each morning for Heartear usually cover the same topics. That was not the case with coverage of Spicer's chemical weapons remarks yesterday.  Fox News and the National Review made no mention of it on their websites. Breitbart buried the story. The other blogs defended Spicer by claiming the Left was over-reacting. The Gateway Pundit article referenced above went to the greatest extreme to apologize for Spicer.

Spicer botched his job yesterday. Our mistakes can be our best teacher. How we respond to the mistakes of others offers teachable moments too. Our reaction to his incompetence shines a powerful light on our own character, biases and values.


Tuesday, April 11, 2017

Wishful thinking

Article

An Indispensable Nation After All

Summary

William Murchison in The American Spectator praises Pres. Trump for seeing beyond the Nationalist perspective of "America first" and intervening in Syria.

Quote

"George Bush’s democracy-for-everybody line of business was unrealistic; but so, in a world whose dangers he tended to slight, were Barack Obama’s sermons and lectures. If Donald Trump can miraculously steer the indispensable nation between rock-’em-and-sock-’em and oh-mercy-me-what-can-we-do?, ours might prove a safer, freer world."

Understanding

Murchison characterizes our opponents as "punks and thugs" who can be subdued by a strong leader willing to assert forceful intervention.  He proposes the Trump administration should apply to international affairs the New York City "broken windows" policing strategy of bringing down violent crime through zero tolerance of vandalism.

Peace through force is magical thinking as long as we dehumanize our opponents. Even the conservatives cheering Pres. Trump's leadership wish he had a coherent, thoughtful plan or philosophy.


Monday, April 10, 2017

Court intrigue

Article

Donald Trump’s Pick For Top Economic Adviser Is Pro-Immigration, Pro-Outsourcing


Summary

Breitbart attacks the choice of Kevin Hassett to chair the Council of Economic Advisors. The article goes back and forth between two points -

  1. The nomination is a win for the corporate, business-first faction versus the populist, America first faction in Pres. Trump's administration
  2. Hassett's policy positions don't account for all the social costs of immigrants 

Quote

"That’s a standard pitch from D.C.-based legislators, agency officials, and political advisors, all who stand to gain from a more powerful national economy and a greater inflow of taxes — no matter how immigration changes the distribution of income or the [sic] hurts the prospects of ordinary Americans and their children."


Understanding

Hassett has outstanding conservative and academic credentials. The extreme opposition from Breitbart makes the publication seem like Steve Bannon's town crier.

This alleged power struggle between factions in the White House could be important; especially if it is true that Pres. Trump reacts tactically to situations rather than from a strategic philosophy. Policy might come from whoever whispers in his ear last.

The outward appearance of this administration seems similar to the court of Henry VIII with rival nobles vying to influence a mercurial king. Me thinks Jared Kushner is Cromwell.


Saturday, April 8, 2017

The Syrian dilemna

Article

The Middle East: Where American Political Idealism Goes to Die

Still against Intervention in Syria

Bombing Syria: Six reasons why we shouldn't have

Trump's Dangerous Syria Missile Strike

So You Want To Go To War In Syria To Depose Assad. Can You Answer These 14 Questions First?

The Case for Strikes In Syria Is Better Than The Case For War


Summary

Lots of conservative opinion against intervention in Syria. Concerns range from there being no strategic interest for the U.S. to a war there will be too difficult to win.

Quote

"The U.S. attack is an impulsive intervention in a civil war in which both sides — the Damascus/Tehran/Moscow alliance and its Sunni-jihadist/sharia-supremacist opposition — are hostile to the United States. It is a war in which Bashar al-Assad’s continuation in power, dismal as that prospect may be, is in no way the worst conceivable outcome for American national security."

Andrew McCarthy


Understanding

There are competing strains of thought at play in conservative opinion.

Interventionists proclaim -

  • America is back
  • Obama is gone
  • The U.S. is destined to enforce morality on the world order
  • Showing force is good

Nationalists assert -
  • There is no benefit to us
  • Trump is inconsistent
  • We can't win
  • We don't know who we are we helping
This debate might be the epitome of a first-world problem. Our power and geographic distance from war zones give us an option to pick and choose. Our position removed from the fray comes with a heavy intellectual and moral burden, but we get to decide whereas victims in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Afghanistan.... etc. can only hunker down or flee.

How can we look away? How can we send soldiers to die?  The answer depends on our vision for our country. America first and forever?  America the last best hope for the world?


Friday, April 7, 2017

Moral leadership with cruise missiles

Article

Trump air strikes tell Syria's Assad the game is up on chemical weapons

Summary

A Fox News commentator applauds Pres. Trump's decision to attack a Syrian air base. He asserts it was the perfect balance of "kinetic response and forward-leaning diplomacy."

Quote

"President Trump appears to be reasserting American moral leadership, as President Reagan once did.  This event boldly called him out, and we should all be glad it did. He apparently heard the call, did not hesitate, did not over or under calibrate, and did not tweet."

Understanding

What are the consequences of using cruise missiles to assert moral leadership?  The strike will affirm for those who believe in American exceptionalism that we are fulfilling our unique mission to transform the world. There will be a bounce for Pres. Trump's approval rating. The calculations in diplomatic conversations with Russia and China will include our renewed willingness to use military force. North Korea will be inflamed. Assad and his supporters will pause and ponder how far will Pres. Trump go in pursuit of Syrian regime change?.

Cruise missiles are a limited tool. Moral leadership will come from a range of sustained, consistent actions grounded in significant principles.

The questions are more important than the answers the missiles delivered. Can we pursue American exceptionalism without hubris? Can we moderate our use of force to be appropriate for specific objectives? Can we avoid going so far down the road of aggression that we have no way back to stability?




Thursday, April 6, 2017

The role of religion in politics

Article

The Left Can Cite Scripture for its Own Purpose

Summary

Ben Shapiro believes liberals select bible passages to justify their policies, but they don't actually believe in the faith. They believe in government.


Quote

"This is the theocracy of the casually religious — and it’s even less attractive than the theocracy of the Biblically extreme. At least the Biblically radical have a textbook guiding them; leftist theocrats merely follow the dictates of their own heart, imputing those dictates to God when the opportunity arises. This makes them not merely tyrants, but heretical tyrants at that."


Understanding

First, let's all tread lightly with the sweeping generalizations about intent and motivation when it comes to individual faith, morality  and ethics. You don't know me Mr. Shapiro but I am one of those liberal Christians you criticize and your narrow stereotyping of me weakens your argument.

I do appreciate the opportunity to consider the relationship between religion and politics. The Founders famously separated church from state. Contemporary conservatives offer religious practice as the alternative to government social welfare. They advocate that church volunteers can replace entitlement programs.

My practice in a faith community doesn't give me confidence that we are viable substitutes for professional social workers or publicly-funded safety nets. My practice in a faith community has enriched, grown and sustained qualities that help me appreciate the awesomeness of being and love my neighbor as myself.

That consciousness informs my values and political positions. I don't have to find proof-texts from scripture to justify my stands if I stand with integrity.




Wednesday, April 5, 2017

Playground rules

Article

Mitch McConnell: GOP evening the score by using the nuclear option for Gorsuch

Summary

The Senate Majority Leader told Fox News that the nuclear option is payback for Democrats breaking the rules of the Senate in 2013.

Quote

"I think they’re responding to their base, which says ‘Resist everything.’ It’s particularly ridiculous to watch it on Gorsuch because there are no good arguments to vote against Gorsuch. None whatsoever."

Understanding

So we've come to this? This is statesmanship? The Senate of the United States functions like a middle school playground?

Republicans want to get even for something that happened four years ago. Democrats want to show Republicans they should have given Merrick Garland a hearing. The consequence of their bickering is flushing checks and balances down the drain and throwing bipartisanship out the window.

Resist. Persist. It is so much easier to say 'no' than 'yes.'  So much easier to obstruct than construct. The most courageous senator will not be the one who filibusters for 10 hours. The most courageous senator will be the one who steps across the aisle for a conversation.

Tuesday, April 4, 2017

Create a solution not an enemy

Article

Righteous and Wrong

Summary

National Review reporter Jim Geraghty points out that too many political arguments boil down to the idea that "the real problem is those people."

Quote

"This is a key lesson learned in relationship therapy, workplace team-building exercises, and the like: “It’s not you against me; it’s you and me against the problem.” Unfortunately, too many on both sides of the aisle can’t internalize it."

Understanding

The worldview of the Left and the worldview of the Right can be so far apart, it seems impossible to find any common ground as the basis for pragmatic problem-solving. Even sitting down together to really listen and understand appears to be an unacceptable compromise of principles.

Principles do not have to be compromised to collaborate. Forego the hate speech, set aside the powerplay. Discover what we share in common and build a solution from what we both hold dear.


Monday, April 3, 2017

Let's be realistic about Islam

Article

Secularism is No Match for Radical Islam

Summary

Father Benedict Kiely, a Catholic priest, suggests Christians should strive to convert Muslims in order to defeat their violent faith.

Quote

"What drives a former criminal to commit acts of murder and destruction is exactly what drove Islamic militants to wreak the destruction that I witnessed in Iraq — it was my fourth visit there — and that continues to drive them all over the world. It is not, as we are relentlessly told by the experts, an “ideology” that must be “combated.” It is commitment to the faith of Islam, albeit a particular form of the faith." 

Understanding

Words can't describe the horror that is ISIS, but to equate them with Islam is like saying the Westboro Baptist Church represents Christianity. Exaggerating their threat to peace in the West is the kind of argument that launched the Crusades.

Let's keep a level-headed, realistic perspective.


Saturday, April 1, 2017

Learning by example

Article

Throw Away the New Playbook

Summary

Jonah Goldberg writing in the National Review argues that Pres. Trump needs to start adhering to tried and true political practices to have a successful presidency.

Quote

"The simple fact is that new playbooks, like new ideas, are as a statistical matter more likely to be wrong than right (there are literally an infinite number of “ideas”; there is a very finite number of good, practical ideas). The essence of conservatism is to respect practices, customs, norms, and values that have survived the brutal acid of trial and error. “What is conservatism?” Lincoln asked. “Is it not the adherence to the old and tried against the new and untried?”"

Understanding

Goldberg suggests that political systems are like weather systems in that both are aggregations of specific acts of nature or self-interest accumulated into a pervasive, indifferent force.  Both the Left and the Right are delusional to think that, in the case of the Left, a high-minded intellectual principle will change reality; or, in the case of the Right, a businessman can cut a deal that will alter nature.

Perhaps the cold, hard reality of his administration's struggles will cause Pres. Trump to re-evaluate his approach and improve his ability to govern. Blindly defending him doesn't help him get there, nor does heated opposition.

The country needs reasonable debate now more than ever.



Friday, March 31, 2017

Not worth the fight

Article


Mike Pence’s Wise Family Practices Expose a Deep Divide Over Human Nature

Summary

David French writing in the National Review supports the Pence family's rules because putting men and women together in intimate or intense situations will inevitably lead to sexual relationships.

Quote

"God made men and women for each other. People can and do reject that notion and emerge unscathed. People can understand that truth and still fall. Life can’t be reduced to formulas. But what do you do when you understand that truth? The Pences know. Most Christians know. To defy reality is to needlessly and arrogantly risk ruin. To understand reality is to embrace humility and prudence." 

Understanding

One of the roles public figures play is to reflect, even amplify, the social issues of our times. Our chatter about the Pence family rules exposes the gulf between belief systems that creates two of the most divisive tribes in our country.

On the Right is the conviction that men and women were created to complement each other. Deep and powerful forces of attraction are bound to come into play when two members of the opposite sex share a meal alone together.

On the Left, men and women are seen as people, not genders. The Left finds it odd and sexist to believe that a man and a woman can't have dinner together on the same basis of friendship or professional collegiality as a matched gender pairing.

(Note the possibility of sexual attraction between two men or two women isn't even mentioned in French's commentary. Its absence says something about the author's worldview that is worthy of separate consideration.)

The premise of this debate inflames an unnecessary and unhelpful cultural battle. The fundamental reason we are even talking about a private family decision is that it gives us an opportunity to poke the other side, rile up some rhetoric and demonstrate the superior values of one group versus the other.

This is a case where we should live our own lives and let others do the same.

Thursday, March 30, 2017

Moderation is the virtue for these times

Article


Summary

Kurt Schlichter writing in Downhill accuses democrats of constitutional violations, political malfeasance and character flaws to make the case for true conservatives to aggressively assert their power; beginning with invoking the "nuclear option*" to affirm Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court.

*The nuclear option is the phrase Senator Harry Reid used to describe the rule change allowing the Senate to approve presidential nominees by a simple majority rather than a two-thirds vote.

Quote

"The libs need to suffer some more, so the GOP must move aggressively and without mercy to place as many reliable conservatives on the bench as we can. Let the battle cry sound fourth {sic} across this land!

Hiroshima!
Nagasaki!
Gorsuch!"

Understanding

Schlichter's screed reminds me of the line Karl Hess wrote for Sen. Barry Goldwater's speech accepting the Republican nomination for president in 1964 -

“Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue.”

Schlichter is clear in his conviction that our courts should be politically neutral, but if that is not possible, the judiciary should be conservative defenders of the constitution. OK, that's a reasonable position, but I wonder why he chose such spiteful rhetoric for this commentary? He sounds like someone outside the boardroom trying to get noticed. In fact, his team occupies all the seats of power, so why do they have to be ruthless?

It feels like there is a strain of vengeance animating the opinions, and perhaps the policies, of some in the Republican party. To the extent that is true, moderation will be the most effective response.


Wednesday, March 29, 2017

The integrity question

Article

Religious Trumpians Suffer from Stockholm Syndrome

Summary

Ben Shapiro writing in the National Review calls out conservatives for abandoning their political philosophy to back Pres. Trump.

Quote

"In other words, many conservatives have become religious Trumpians. There is nothing Trump can do to lose their love and respect. If he turns to the left, they’ll blame conservatives for failing to kowtow to leftist policy. If he gets nothing done, they’ll blame everybody else on earth for failing to support Trump properly. The god must be appeased."

Understanding

Personal integrity faces many challenges. Is our conviction strong enough to withstand suffering or the easy way out? What are we willing to lose, or not accept, to remain justified? Are we certain our principles are correct or could we be swayed by a leader's charisma? Must we stand alone when the crowd surges past us?

Conservatives who set aside their traditional policy positions to beat Hillary now face a reckoning. Since Pres. Trump is no longer a sure-fire winner, do they continue to blindly follow his lead or do they revive the philosophy of their heritage?

Good question. I'm glad they are asking. I look forward to the result of their reflection.



Tuesday, March 28, 2017

Compassion is our compulsion

Article


The False Compassion of Liberalism

Summary

Stephen Moore argues in Townhall that expecting government to fund compassionate policies and services constricts individual charity.

Quote

"The liberal creed seems to be: "We care so much about poor people, climate change, income inequality and protecting the environment (or whatever the cause of the day) that there is no limit to how much money should be taken out of other people's wallets to solve these problems."

Understanding

The money that goes in and out of our bank accounts is personal. We claim it as ours. Our work generates the paycheck. We get to decide how to spend it. Of course taxation, especially when we oppose government policies, can feel frustrating and unfair. It usurps our sense of individual liberty and personal property rights.

OK, I get it. But let's not judge, label and denigrate, all right?

Certain acute, specific issues come to our attention, and we might respond to the particular matter with a donation earmarked for that cause. Most of us can't give enough individually to fix the problem but we get to do some small part to help.

What about the problems we don't see? What about unjust systems that are too big and complex for an individual to fathom let alone affect? For those challenges, our government magnifies our individual tax payments for the greater good of society. Taxes allocated to social services are an investment in order and opportunity. The dividends pay down the public burden of welfare and incarceration costs.

We're all in this together and both answers are correct.




Monday, March 27, 2017

A perspective on terrorism

Article

Do Muslims Commit Most U.S. Terrorism Attacks?

Summary

The Libertarian publication Reason cites a Georgia State University study into U.S. terror attacks and media coverage that found -

  1. Of the 89 terrorist attacks on U.S. soil in the last five years, 11 were perpetrated by Muslims
  2. Those 11 attacks generated 44% of the media coverage on the 89 incidents
  3. Eighteen of the 89 attacks were against Muslims

Quote

"Your risk of being killed in a jihadist terror attack in the last 15 years amounted to roughly 1 in 2,640,000. Even if you stretch the period back to include 9/11, the risk would still just have been 1 in 110,000. Your lifetime risk of dying in a lightning strike is 1 in 161,000, and your chance of being killed in a motor vehicle crash is 1 in 114. Given that our government has already squandered more than $500 billion on homeland security, while encroaching on our liberties, it is vital that Americans keep the threat of terrorism in perspective." 

Understanding

The New York Times published an article Sunday, "One Nation Under Fox," that chronicled 18 hours of programming on the popular TV network last Thursday. The Times found that the amount of coverage Fox news anchors, program hosts, reporters and commentators gave "radical, Islamic terrorism"  was disproportionately greater than other mainstream news sources.

Why do we vilify others and fear phantom threats? What need in us does this stereotyping and anxiety fulfill? Divisiveness and violence will persist until we understand why we create and perpetuate the bogeyman. Identifying how the terrorist, the immigrant and the ni**er satisfy a need in our character is how the healing will begin.

We have created the other for some purpose, to solve some problem. Can we find a different solution?


Saturday, March 25, 2017

The aftermath of failure

Article

The range of responses to the defeat of the AHCA are found in the links below -
  1. We're moving on
  2. It's their (Democrats) fault 
  3. It's their (Freedom Caucus) fault
  4. It's his (Ryan's) fault
  5. It's his (Trump's) fault
  6. It's not his (Trump's) fault
  7. Somebody (Republicans representatives) will pay for this
  8. Get back up and try again 
  9. It's their (Democrats) problem now 

Summary

Blame belongs to that person or those people

Quote

"The hopefully temporary deferral of the repeal and replacement of ObamaCare represents a great opportunity to simplify the tax code and re-organize federal welfare payments."

“We had no Democratic support,” Trump said from the Oval Office. “They weren’t going to give us a single vote.”

"This is an utter disaster for U.S. health care, not to mention individual liberty, and the responsibility rests squarely on shoulders of a small cadre of political opportunists with the effrontery to call themselves the “House Freedom Caucus.”

"Yes, AHCA failure is a failure for the president, but it’s much more a failure for House leadership and Paul Ryan."

"It appears President Trump cared a lot more about getting a win than about what, exactly, he would be winning. And that lack of focus on the details helped deny him the victory he wanted so badly."

“There is no question in my mind at least that the president and the team here have left everything on the field.”

"Deflated Republican voters may similarly find themselves done with their representatives on the Hill."

"They have spent seven years saying they were going to replace Obamacare. They didn’t say they were going to spend a few weeks on a half-baked plan and then give up. Back to work, ladies and gentlemen."

"The message today that is sent is: Democrats own ObamaCare," Spicer said. "It's a failing system - skyrocketing premiums and deductibles, and fewer choices. But it's now squarely in the hands of Democrats. They own this."

Understanding

How we respond to defeat and failure says so much about our character. So far, only Paul Ryan has hinted at the need for self-reflection and personal accountability rather than blaming others.


Friday, March 24, 2017

This jockey can win no matter which horse finishes first

Article

Why Steve Bannon Might be the Winner of the GOP's Health Care Civil War

Summary

Gabriel Sherman writing in New York magazine says Steve Bannon has positioned himself so that Pres. Trump, and to greater extent,  Paul Ryan and Congress will shoulder the blame if the American Health Care Act fails.

Quote

"The failure to repeal and replace Obamacare would be a stinging defeat for Trump. But it would be an even bigger defeat for Paul Ryan, who has all but staked his Speakership on passing this bill. And in the hall of mirrors that is Washington, the big winner to emerge out of the health-care debacle could be Steve Bannon. That’s because Bannon has been waging war against Ryan for years. For Bannon, Ryan is the embodiment of the “globalist-corporatist” Republican elite. A failed bill would be Bannon’s best chance yet to topple Ryan and advance his nationalist-populist economic agenda."

Understanding

Powerful people encounter at least two compelling priorities -

  1. How do I use my position to do what is right?
  2. How do I preserve my power? 
How powerful people work through those internal questions can lead to great good or great corruption.

Mr. Bannon's alleged goal of deconstructing the administrative state gains some juice if the AHCA fails. Bannon's agenda might gain even more momentum if the AHCA passes and disappoints. That scenario could strengthen the argument of the Freedom Caucus that government has little or no business in health care and entitlements are an archaic vestige of the Deep State.

We might be wise to review Machiavelli's The Prince or look carefully at how Thomas Cromwell maneuvers in Hillary Mantel's historical novels on the court of Henry VIII. The forces of power are at play in the public strong-arm tactics of Pres. Trump and in the shadows where men new to power privately whisper and smirk.

Thursday, March 23, 2017

Stop it

Article

Trump's warning on illegal immigrants proves grimly prophetic

Summary

Sean Hannity focuses on some recent crimes and his own experience to make a case for Pres. Trump's immigration policy.

Quote

"President Trump is right: We can never forget those whose lives were destroyed by illegal immigrants. And we need to demand a secure border and an end to local policies that allow illegal immigrant criminals to prey on innocent Americans."

Understanding

Hannity cites unattributed statistics to make his case, so I wanted to see what other data might indicate -

  1. A NY Times article from March 6, 2017, "Here’s the Reality About Illegal Immigrants in the United States" references Migration Policy Institute estimates that about 300,000 of the 11 million undocumented residents of the United States have committed a felony in the past decade.
  2. The FBI's annual report "Crime in the United States" estimates there were 1,197,704 violent crimes committed in 2015
  3. In 2015, CNN cited findings from a Mother Jones article that assembled data on mass shootings the U.S. since 1982. The racial profile of the mass shooters was -
  • 64% white men
  • 16% black men
  • 9% Asian men
  • 11% Latino, Native American or unknown

About 300,000 felonies in the last decade compared to over a million violent crimes in one year. Nearly two-thirds of the mass shootings in the U.S. by white men versus an indistinguishable amount attributed to Latinos.

Hannity's priority is hard to justify or defend. I can only guess his personal motives but I won't since I don't know him. His public persona has the style of a bully and the conventional wisdom is that bullys are insecure, frustrated and hurt. Some bully because they are copying behavior of people they admire.

That potential for copycat behavior is frightening. Hannity copies Trump. How many will copy Hannity? Empathy is not part of the solution here. This behavior needs to stop.

Wednesday, March 22, 2017

Flunking out but not giving up

Article

The Alt-Right is What Happens when Society Marginalizes Men

Summary

Owen Strachan says stereotyping alt-right males as childish, vicious losers avoids facing the plight of contemporary men as an  important social concern. He says young men are "angry, flailing and dangerously volatile." He warns that dismissing their perspective is foolish and dangerous.

Quote

"It leaves you susceptible to groundswells that sweep over a culture seemingly without warning—the Tea Party, Brexit, Trump. Many folks on the progressive side assume that because they have won the college campus and now dominate the urban centers of power that the cultural game is over."

"But what looks like a fortress-grade progressive order is really an unstable element, as we have seen several times over. The ideological insurgency will never have Ivy League degrees to award, coveted Beltway bylines to dole out, or global-power conference invites to issue. But the insurgency is finding its audience, and the audience is destabilizing and even remaking the public-square, and all without central coordination or control of leading cultural institutions."

Understanding

It's finals week at my college, so here is a response to this content as a multiple-choice question -

  1. Oh see how alt-right apologists are trying to normalize their behavior and create sympathy for these victims of political correctness
  2. Why yes young men are falling behind and we should try to help them rather than  judge them by the most extreme behavior of their tribe
  3. The fundamental problem is gender stereotyping that prescribes roles and norms which limit how men and women can freely express ourselves 
  4. All of the above
I choose #4 which leads to no immediate solution other than treading warily, yet optimistically, forward looking for opportunities to connect and reconcile.

Tuesday, March 21, 2017

Looking past the fear

Article

Watch Out Conservatives: Natural Disasters Can Create Opportunities for Dictators

(Thanks to Will Sommer and Right Richter for this reference.)

Summary

Rachel Alexander writing in Townhall warns that the eminent earthquake in the Pacific Northwest could lead to dictatorial rule.

Quote

"If the wrong person becomes president of the U.S., a natural disaster could allow them to seize dictatorial control. Although President Trump is a strong leader who promotes freedom and democracy, the left is doing everything it can to oust him. The left has a recent track record of taking leaders out using sham legal witch hunts. This is the easiest way they may take Trump out."

Understanding

Alexander cites a list of fears in this article -

  1. Natural disasters
  2. Left-wing conspiracies
  3. Thwarting Pres. Trump's power
  4. Secular persecution of Christians

Passion,  whether it is righteous or paranoid, can engulf reason and coherence. Wisdom comes with time, patience and a willingness to see past the initial outrage to understand how and why someone cares so deeply about something that seems so strange.

Monday, March 20, 2017

States rights after all?

Article

A Blue State Secession Model I Can Get Behind

Summary

The National Review columnist points out that Kevin Baker's essay in The New Republic supporting blue states like California, Oregon and Washington seceding from the union makes liberals sound like constitutional conservatives.

Quote

"After all, did the Founders envision a federal administrative mega-bureaucracy that stripped virtually every major social policy from the states, often leaving them marginal players (compared with the feds) in their own citizens’ welfare?" 

Understanding

Federalism is the political system where central and regional governments share power equally. Conservatives argue that the United States skews the balance to favor Washington D.C.

The irony of liberals now wanting less federal interference is worth noting. The National Review columnist suggests this ideological agreement could lead to bipartisan collaboration if we could just stop being angry.

I have a hard time swallowing that proposal because I can't get over how the "states rights" argument was used against the civil rights movement. So here I am stuck in the past, fighting and old battle and not forgiving.

It's just that I worry it's not an old battle. The struggle continues and my fears keep me from the common table where I could talk to conservatives about his issue. Huh. That sounds familiar too.

Saturday, March 18, 2017

Building on a shared moral foundation

Article

Socialism's Rising Popularity Threatens America's Future

Summary

We should feel alarmed that a survey by the American Faith and Culture Institute (AFCI) found that 40% of the adults in its study prefer socialism to capitalism. The article's author blames education where, he says, "The benefits of socialism are taught from the Ivy League to the local community college."

Of particular concern to the survey researcher and the article author is that 70% of the survey respondents who identified as liberal reported they support traditional values. The researcher warns, "liberals may redefine 'traditional moral values' to include beliefs and behaviors that are not at all traditional or moral from a biblical perspective."

Quote

"Conservative and traditionally minded Americans can no longer assume that their neighbor believes what they believe or that he defines the terms of political discourse the same way. The country has changed."

Understanding

The AFCI uses a 15-pont checklist of belief statements to categorize people into those who view the world with a biblical perspective versus those who do not.

My summary of the list is that being on the AFCI team means worshiping the literal text of a document composed within the particular cultural constructs of the eastern Mediterranean between 1,500 BC and 200 AD and curated by religious, male elites in church councils during the fourth and fifth centuries of the current era.

People, liberal or conservative, seek a coherent system to guide how we live in society. Conservatives tend to prefer relying on concrete, time-tested principles.  Liberals tend to prefer applying their values to an interpretation of a particular situation.

While the strategies differ, we can share a moral foundation. The contradictions in our approaches don't have to make us afraid to talk to each other about our differences since, at the root we share so much in common.







Friday, March 17, 2017

Shared wickedness

Article


How To Be A ‘Woke’ White Person: Join The Alt-Right

Summary


The author criticizes white liberals who engage in the racial political debate for the purpose of signaling their own virtue as a weapon to take away moral authority from some people.


Quote

"The result was that rejection of racism, instead of becoming a universal creed above partisan bickering, got reduced to a narrow partisan cudgel, a way of beating up people who disagree with you and making you feel good about yourself by comparison."
"But now it has gotten out of control, and blacks and other minorities have started to realize the extent to which they were being used as a tool of somebody else’s self-validation."
"The Left has embraced a racial politics that doesn’t seek to gather people together in a common cause, but instead seeks to divide them into separate groups in a never-ending ritual of power struggles. They had better be careful what they wish for, because at the rate they’re going, they just might get it—and smash everything to pieces."

Understanding

Blaming the Left for turning racial politics into "a narrow partisan cudgel" doesn't gather us together in common cause. The rhetoric of this argument contributes to our divisions. The final sentence even evokes mob violence as the threatening outcome of the Left's agenda.

Manufacturing and focusing on bogeymen will not resolve our racial divisions. Both the Left and Right ends of the political spectrum are guilty of stereotyping and name-calling. Acknowledging that we share those sins in common might help bring us together.


Thursday, March 16, 2017

Meet me at the monastery

Article

Rod Dreher On The Future Of Christianity In A Post-Christian Nation


Summary

Rod Dreher is a senior editor at the American Conservative and author of the new book, “The Benedict Option: A Strategy for Christians in a Post-Christian Nation.” Dreher joins Federalist Radio to explain the ancient ways of the Benedict Option, the roots of religious decline in America, and how Christians can save their culture and communities.

Quote

"We are called to live in the world, but if we are to live in the world faithfully, we have to withdraw from the world to some extent for formation so we can be salt and light to the world."

Understanding

Dreher wants Christianity to be at the center of our lives, culture and politics. His sense is that traditional values need to be protected and restored. He points to St. Benedict's withdrawal from the sordid life of the Roman Empire as a model for figuring out a new way to be in community.

I am not afraid of what Dreher fears, nor do I share his goal of restoring Christendom. I would like to talk with him about his practice. I think I could learn something that might draw mine from being less self-serving and more networked into serving society.

Wednesday, March 15, 2017

A man's inner world

Article

Why They Need the Cucks


Summary

Jessa Crispin explains the alt right's use of the archaic word cuckold is based on men with embattled masculinity needing to assert power by diminishing others.

Quote

"Here, then, is the task of the twenty-first-century American man: making hierarchies that don’t put him at the bottom. The bottom is where the cucks are—because “cuck,” in its current incarnation, is an insult aimed not at men who are betrayed by women...but at men who don’t have anyone to control."

Understanding

Masculinity has traditionally been defined by how men appear and what we achieve.  My manliness score is based on the size of my body, how much money I earn and how many women I screw. As a slight-framed, government salaried, 40-years monogamous male; I'm pretty low in that pecking order. As a loser in that lottery, it's easier for me to see the limitations of traditional masculinity.

No wonder men who buy into that model find themselves lacking and look to exploit weakness in others. What a sorry use of their pain.

Do I want more power, prosperity and prowess? Not for the price I would have to pay. I will not trample others to climb to the top. I will not sacrifice the joys of togetherness for the stuff of selfishness. I will not betray love for gratification.

Rather than admiring alpha males and their wannabes, perhaps it would be better to feel compassion for them. Perhaps we should not define our manliness based on how our score ranks in a hierarchy, We could define our manliness based on the power of our helpfulness, the abundance we share and the joy we create.



Tuesday, March 14, 2017

Restore what?

Article

Other People's Babies and American Values

Summary

Jonathan Tobin in The National Review urges conservatives to distance themselves from the ideology of Iowa congressman Steve King who tweeted in support of the far-right Dutch politician Geert Wilders -

Wilders understands that culture and demographics are our destiny. 
We can’t restore our civilization with somebody else’s babies.

Quote

"That is why it is incumbent upon conservatives to reject any connection between their beliefs or their political party with the ideas that animated Steve King’s tweet. A failure to do so will not merely hurt conservatives politically; it will hasten the decline of the values they cherish."

Understanding

Diversity is a defining characteristic of America. Our multicultural nature creates tragedies and tensions as it enriches and energizes us. People of all colors and faiths are held together in an American identity through our tradition as a nation of immigrants and our "pursuit of liberty and justice for all." Those qualities and ideals are what civilize us. Our civilization is restored by our openness not by the fears of privileged, white men.


Monday, March 13, 2017

A greater love

Article

Evangelicals need to stop being wimps

Summary

America would become truly great again if evangelical Christians were to find their voice and courage.

Quote

"Righteous anger has a place within the Christian life.  Tap into it.  In the words of Ephesians 4:26, 'Be angry and do not sin.'”

Understanding

Is accepting people as they are a greater expression of love than desiring something more for them? I believe we are all basically the same and essentially good. That stance may be less compassionate than believing, and acting, on the principle that we can be more than who we are.

The challenge for evangelicals is the narrowness of their judgment and the language of their argument. This author asserts that his interpretation of Christianity is the only true way and he cruelly labels people he finds objectionable.

I want to hold fast to righteous principles, not shy away from speaking my truth  while loving the other without condemnation.



Saturday, March 11, 2017

If enough was enough

Article

Putting Work in its Place

Summary

Our conception of the role of work distorts our political and family life.

Quote

"Members of the economy are increasingly unable to understand themselves as providing for a family and as cultivating a particular skill that contributes to the common good. They instead understand themselves as embroiled in a competitive race to an ever-receding pinnacle of success and, at the same time, as stuck in the vicious cycle of consumption and emptiness."

Understanding

How much is enough? Nelson Rockefeller famously answered, "Just a little bit more."

Politicians on both the Left and the Right aspire to eliminate barriers to individual success such as poverty, prejudice foreign workers, bad trade deals or regulation then let the free market make winners out of some of its participants. The elites are anointed and the also-rans become frustrated voters or opt out of the electorate.

What if we valued the quality of how each of us contributes rather than how some of us get ahead?  What if the restless striving that characterizes our American character was oriented toward doing our share rather than hoarding more shares? What if what we have is all that we want?

It seems naive to think our culture could recalibrate its values so radically. If we don't we will stay how we are only more so. We can begin with ourselves and the values we model for our children.

Friday, March 10, 2017

Faith abides

Article

"Americans have lost faith in institutions. That's not because of Trump or 'fake news.'

Summary

Bill Bishop writing in The Washington Post claims everything about modern life works against community and trust. Society has frayed because we have elevated the value of individual autonomy. The causes predate Pres. Trump and there is nothing we can do about it.

Quote

"We have become, in Polish sociologist Zygmunt Bauman’s description, “artists of our own lives,” ignoring authorities and booting traditions while turning power over to the self."


Understanding

It is easy to use the past to identify what is lacking in the present and what is threatening to our future. It is harder to identify how the elements of our current predicament might bloom into a better tomorrow.

During my active parenting years I grieved that children didn't enjoy spontaneous, unstructured, communal play. I recalled fondly how on weekends or after school a dozen or so of my childhood buddies would gather for games of tag, baseball or football. My kids were more isolated and into TV, computer games and organized sports.

Now I work with a lot of people aged 19-35. I see how they use hand-held devices to connect and build community through liking, commenting, sharing and participating. I see how they value kindness and inclusion. Their interactions remind me of the Saturday afternoons of my youth except that they enjoy multiple, positive social interactions every day. Their smart phones replaced the bat and ball that were the devices that brought my community together.

OK we have lost what was familiar. That always happens. So does the arrival of something better that we can't fully imagine just now.


Thursday, March 9, 2017

Governing the ego

Article

Where are the Republican Party's Leaders?

Summary

Ian Tuttle writing in "The National Review" says Pres. Trump's bashing of traditional conservative principles as he ascended to power has left the GOP gun-shy.

Quote

"But, of course, this leadership crisis is at root a crisis of faith. The Republican party doesn’t know what it believes right now."


Understanding

While confidence is a necessary attribute of leadership, hubris is its cancerous over-production. It takes a nimble trick of the ego to realize the attributes that get us into a leadership position are not sufficient for us to lead effectively.

We need the relationships we trampled on our way to the top. We need expert advice. We have to compromise to move forward. We receive the ideas of others and accept their help. Humility comes to us more naturally when we hold dear principles bigger than our selves.




Wednesday, March 8, 2017

Is Pres. Trump the new Mao?

Article

The one book to understand Steve Bannon

Summary

Bannon tells "Axios'" Jonathan Swan that The Revolt of the Elites by Christopher Lasch is one of his favorites for explaining our times.

Quote

"Reading 'The Revolt of the Elites' gives you a deeper appreciation of the populist nationalist movement that propelled Trump to the presidency. It also gives you deeper insight into how Bannon thinks — his disdain for experts and party establishments, his skepticism on multinationals, his commitment to information warfare and the Breitbart comments section, his antipathy toward "globalists" and his particular distrust of the West Coast elite Lasch writes feel more loyalty to Hong Kong and Singapore than they do to "Middle America." Jonathan Swan

Understanding

Swan's article pulls out eight statements from The Revolt of the Elites to suggest how Bannon thinks. While it is a fallacious to assume Lasch's words equal Bannon's beliefs, there are some provocative ideas listed. Here is one -

  • "We have become far too accommodating and tolerant for our own good....Compassion has become the human face of contempt...Today we accept double standards — as always, a recipe for second-class citizenship — in the name of humanitarian concern." Christopher Lasch
While that statement seems harsh, it is out of context and I assume the author has good intent, not cruelty, as his motivation. Perhaps we elites do use charity as a way to reinforce our privileged status and maintain the status quo of a society that works very well for us. Perhaps what Lasch and Bannon are calling for is a radical transformation of our class structure to be more egalitarian.

Huh. I used to aspire to the same goal when I was an undergraduate Maoist and admirer of China's Cultural Revolution.

I wonder how far the wealthy, white men in charge of the federal government right now will push that agenda?




Tuesday, March 7, 2017

Watch your mouth

Article

A Glossary of Far-Right Terms and Memes


Summary

BuzzFeed has assembled a useful list of the jargon and icons that members of the alt-right use in their communications.


Quote

"The Overton Window
A general concept to describe the limits ("window") of what the public finds acceptable. Some pundits have suggested that Trump has shifted the scope of this window, and that things like the "grab her by the pussy" comment would have previously been career-ending for a politician. The alt-right believes it's helping shift the Overton window for the public by making the movement's extreme speech normalized, and in its wake has opened up the path for Trump." 


Understanding

Sometimes I catch myself judging people into categories of those who "get it" versus those who don't. The people who "get it" share my worldview, and one of the primary ways I believe this to be true is through our shared vocabulary, cultural reference points and inside jokes.

Language connects and separates. I sound ridiculous when I throw down popular Millennial slang after looking it up in Urban Dictionary. I used to think I was signaling myself as an LGBTQ ally when I used phrases like,  "That's so gay..." until I realized how it hurt.

Learning the vocabulary and iconography of the alt-right can provide insight. Appropriating their insults into points of pride, e.g. pussy hats, helps deflect the pain.

Snowflakes, let's not minimize the cruelty beneath the surface as their vocabulary becomes commonplace.